The £150 million speeding fine

New figures underscore thecost of speed cameras,fine. Indeed,almost six in ten of those surveyed
as the level of cynicism among drivers isconfirmed,admitted to driving in such amanner, with a further 54
with many motorists increasingly viewing the roadsideper cent blaming them for encouraging erraticdriving.
yellowboxes as little more than revenue-raisingThe majority of those questioned said that speed
devices.cameras were adistraction on the road, increasing their
Speed cameras are costing motorists in England andchances of an accident ratherthan encouraging safer
Wales up to £150million a year through thedriving, with over seven in ten admitted topaying more
combined cost of fines and increased carinsuranceattention to speed cameras and their speedometer
premiums. Research commissioned by Swift Coverthanpotential hazards. In contrast, many drivers argued
car insurancerevealed that drivers are paying out inthat they wouldactually be safer if allowed to continue
excess of £114 million a yearin fines. Added to thisspeeding, with seven in ten ofthose convicted for
is the increased premium charged by manyinsurersspeeding claiming that they had been driving safelyfor
following a speeding conviction, estimated at £36the conditions of the road at the time.
million ayear, and drivers are paying out £150Paul Smith, founder of the Safe Speed road safety
million to compensate for theirspeeding lapses.campaign, said thathe was not surprised by the
In total it was found that 2.2 million drivers arefindings, having been warning for yearsthat speed
convicted forspeeding every year, almost half of thesecameras make the roads more dangerous.
having been caught byroadside cameras. ManyHe also said that the latest figures undermine the
experts credit the escalating number ofgovernment'sargument that speed cameras have
speedcameras with the corresponding rise in speedingpublic backing, describing theirclaims as "misleading".
convictions, withspeeding fines up 328 per cent over"The government claims that 80% (or so) of people
the past decade, which has alsoseen the UK's speedsupport speedcameras. This survey (conducted under
camera network swell to 6,000.proper conditions by a reputableprofessional polling
Unsurprisingly given this cost, speed cameras do notcompany) proves, once again, that governmentfigures
rank highly amonga list of drivers favourite things.are highly misleading," he said.
Around two-thirds of thosesurveyed thought speed"Please listen, Mr Darling and Dr Ladyman; We don't
cameras were "mainly" installed to raiserevenue, withwant your cameras.
just 13 per cent agreeing that they are the best wayWe don't believe they make us safer. We don't have
toencourage safe driving.any faith in yourroad safety policies. Bite the bullet,
In fact, many argue that speed cameras actuallyadmit that speed cameras don'twork, and let's get
encourage unsafedriving, with Swift Cover claimingback to real road safety policies. Your infernalcameras
that they have encouraged a trendfor 'yo-yo driving',are killing us indirectly, because, at best, they
whereby drivers speed up between cameras andreplacegenuine life-saving roadsafety policies," he
thenslam their breaks on at the last minute to avoid apleaded.