How to get help for DWI
 

Welcome to our DWI Archive. Have fun browsing.

 

Article #81: The £150 million speeding fine

(Browse for more articles)

 
New figures underscore thecost of speed driving in such amanner, with a further
cameras, as the level of cynicism among 54 per cent blaming them for encouraging
drivers isconfirmed, with many motorists erraticdriving.
increasingly viewing the roadside The majority of those questioned said
yellowboxes as little more than that speed cameras were adistraction on
revenue-raising devices. the road, increasing their chances of an
Speed cameras are costing motorists in accident ratherthan encouraging safer
England and Wales up to £150million a driving, with over seven in ten admitted
year through the combined cost of fines topaying more attention to speed cameras
and increased carinsurance premiums. and their speedometer thanpotential
Research commissioned by Swift Cover car hazards. In contrast, many drivers
insurancerevealed that drivers are paying argued that they wouldactually be safer
out in excess of £114 million a yearin if allowed to continue speeding, with
fines. Added to this is the increased seven in ten ofthose convicted for
premium charged by manyinsurers following speeding claiming that they had been
a speeding conviction, estimated at £36 driving safelyfor the conditions of the
million ayear, and drivers are paying out road at the time.
£150 million to compensate for Paul Smith, founder of the Safe Speed
theirspeeding lapses. road safety campaign, said thathe was not
In total it was found that 2.2 million surprised by the findings, having been
drivers are convicted forspeeding every warning for yearsthat speed cameras make
year, almost half of these having been the roads more dangerous.
caught byroadside cameras. Many experts He also said that the latest figures
credit the escalating number of undermine the government'sargument that
speedcameras with the corresponding rise speed cameras have public backing,
in speeding convictions, withspeeding describing theirclaims as "misleading".
fines up 328 per cent over the past "The government claims that 80% (or so)
decade, which has alsoseen the UK's speed of people support speedcameras. This
camera network swell to 6,000. survey (conducted under proper conditions
Unsurprisingly given this cost, speed by a reputableprofessional polling
cameras do not rank highly amonga list of company) proves, once again, that
drivers favourite things. Around governmentfigures are highly misleading,"
two-thirds of thosesurveyed thought speed he said.
cameras were "mainly" installed to "Please listen, Mr Darling and Dr
raiserevenue, with just 13 per cent Ladyman; We don't want your cameras.
agreeing that they are the best way We don't believe they make us safer. We
toencourage safe driving. don't have any faith in yourroad safety
In fact, many argue that speed cameras policies. Bite the bullet, admit that
actually encourage unsafedriving, with speed cameras don'twork, and let's get
Swift Cover claiming that they have back to real road safety policies. Your
encouraged a trendfor 'yo-yo driving', infernalcameras are killing us
whereby drivers speed up between cameras indirectly, because, at best, they
and thenslam their breaks on at the last replacegenuine life-saving roadsafety
minute to avoid a fine. Indeed,almost policies," he pleaded.
six in ten of those surveyed admitted to






1- A- B- C- 2- 3- 4- 5- 6- 7- 8- 9- 10- 11- 12- 13- 14- 15- 16- 17- 18- 19- 20- 21- 22- 23- 24- 25- 26- 27- 28- 29- 30- 31- 32- 33- 34- 35- 36- 37- 38- 39- 40- 41- 42- 43- 44- 45- 46- 47- 48- 49- 50- 51-