Debating the Ignition Interlock System

One of the newest advancements in DUI legislation isdeal with alcoholism.  It allows them (and others
sparking a major controversy among lobbyists andgranted the privilege of a hardship license) to keep
lawmakers.  The Blood Alcohol Ignition Interlocktheir jobs so they can live their lives and support their
Device (BAIID) is a lockout device installed in thefamilies.  The device grants people the freedom to
passenger compartment of a car and hooked up tolive their lives and attend counseling while also
the engine.  Before driving, an offender must breathepromoting more responsible driving decisions.
into the device so that it can gauge a BAC (bloodIn a perfect world, that may be enough, but this world
alcohol content) reading.  If the driver is within legalis not perfect, and the device is considerably flawed.
limits, the device allows the engine to turn over and Once the device is installed, it is not set to prevent
start the car.  However, if the driver does not passdrunk driving.  IID’s used in Massachusetts are set
the test, the car will not start.  Once the car startsat .02, well below the legal limit of .08. This low
and it is on the road, the driver must periodicallythreshold essentially prevents any consumption of
breathe into the machine again.  If the BAC is an illegalalcohol within hours of driving.  This is somewhat
level, the ignition interlock device will register a failureunreasonable, and rather than restricting excessive
and the driver will be called in for a interlock violationdrinking and irresponsible driving, it aims to control a
hearing.  These rolling re-tests are required to insureperson’s life by hindering alcohol consumption
that the driver does not fool the device by having acompletely.  In addition, the devices are installed and
sober friend blow into the machine before he or shemonitored at the motorist’s expense, meaning the
drives away, as well as that the driver is not drinkingprivilege is only available to those who can afford it.
while driving. The same options should apply to every person who
There has been agitated debate about this issue sincewalks through that court, and not only those with a fat
its inception.  Although some claim it is the answer towallet. In many cases, the initial and monthly expense
DUI issues, many experts point out that the device isof the IID prevents individuals from getting a hardship
faulty but relied on to a dangerous extent.  Inlicense, because the IID is often a requirement.  
Massachusetts, ignition interlock violations can result inThe ignition interlock is not a reliable device, and it relies
harsh consequences such as a 10 year or lifetimeon the “guilty until proven innocent” mindset.
license suspension.  Lawmakers seem to be putting That is not what this country’s legal system is
high stakes into a machine that is neither 100%supposed to represent.  Testing has suggested that
accurate or reliable, at the expense of the peoples’these machines can easily mistake items like baked
lives it can potentially destroy.  goods, protein bars, mouthwash, and cough drops for
The Ignition Interlock Device is not completelyalcohol.  The sensor tests BAC through an oxidation
problematic and, according to the Registry of Motorreaction to the breath, unlike the more reliable infrared
Vehicles, there are approximately 4,000 Ignitionspectroscopy used in evidentiary breathalyzers.
Interlock Devices in use in Massachusetts.  Like any Therefore, drivers are given a sub-par machine that
debatable item, the device has its high points.  Forcan potentially label them a criminal and destroy their
instance, by preventing people with a high BAC fromlives.  A person should be innocent until proven guilty,
driving, the device may possibly keep the roads saferbut with an unreliable detector, the opposite is true.
and less prone to accidents during certain hours whereHopefully you are now more educated on this matter.
heavy drinking is the norm.  However, the saving Before the laws evolve any more, the existing laws
grace of this appliance is that it is a compromiseneed to be perfected. No one should ever be charged
between the court and the convicted.  Although oftenfor a crime they have not committed and until these
considered harsh for first time offenses, this is a fairdevices are proven to be more accurate, they should
conciliation for people with multiple offenses who maynot be admissible in a court of law.